The widening call to boycott Whole Foods over its CEO John Mackey’s insufficiently-humiliating self-criticism has yet to succeed in denting sales, but it has proven the substance of what we’re up against. While the Left spent the Bush years proclaiming itself the “reality-based community” and praised Obama as embodying their desire for a politics guided by reasoned discourse, they are showing themselves to be about as interested in their opponents’ views as were the Red Guards.*
It is understandable that unions and living-wage advocates would excoriate Wal-Mart and similar employers. But Whole Foods is widely viewed as a model employer–its retail employees are well-paid and receive some of the best benefits in the industry. But as any true zealot can tell you, “a revolution is not a dinner party,” and Mackey has clearly cast his lot with the bourgeoisie and must accordingly be smashed if progress is to proceed.
In the end though, I suspect the primary effect of the re-education campaign will be to send man more of Whole Foods’ affluent shoppers online to find out more about the awful things Mackey said, only to discover that a lot of it actually seems quite reasonable. The sort of folks who can afford an extra 25-50% on their grocery bill are also the sort of people who are currently well-insured and financially secure; “reform” may pose a greater threat to their level of benefits than the status quo. 1994, here we come…
* Yes, I know the poster is from North Korea and the Red Guards are from China. Thankyouverymuchkbye.
Stuart Koehl
October 11, 2009
It's “petard”, actually.
The Snob
October 11, 2009
Shakespeare spelt it “petar” and thus do I.